Oregonian Editorial Board: Wingard Should Go
Evan Manvel
In the news-that-will-not-go-away department, today the editorial board of The Oregonian called for Rep. Matt Wingard to resign.
Interestingly, the editors made parallels with the successful work to oust Mike Schaufler. Of course, Schaufler did not go willingly - he had to be pushed out by a large coalition of courageous leaders.
Excerpts from the piece, "Wingard Should Go":
Last year, House Democrats bounced Rep. Mike Schaufler from his position as co-chair of the House Business and Labor Committee in response to an act of mere unacceptable boorishness, behavior well short of repeated impropriety. Last month, Democratic voters in Schaufler's district, asked their opinion in the primary, removed him from their party's ticket.
Wingard seems determined to hold out, despite any opinions of his colleagues, who have been remarkably quiet, or his constituents. Yet his conduct -- even just the parts he admits -- seems far from the standards the Legislature would claim to uphold.
[Resigning] would provide an opportunity for District 26 Republicans to find a candidate who better represents their standards, and the state's.
Presumably, that would be a candidate with standards higher than no criminal liability.
Of course, it's once again a scoop from Pulitzer-Prize winning Nigel Jaquiss of Willamette Week that first brought this to light.
Carla Axtman summed up Wingard's checkered past earlier.
More Recent Posts | |
Albert Kaufman |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
Kari Chisholm |
Final pre-census estimate: Oregon's getting a sixth congressional seat |
Albert Kaufman |
Polluted by Money - How corporate cash corrupted one of the greenest states in America |
Guest Column |
|
Albert Kaufman |
Our Democrat Representatives in Action - What's on your wish list? |
Kari Chisholm |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
connect with blueoregon
6:06 p.m.
Jun 19, '12
The defeat of Schaufler has made people recognize that an incumbent can be held accountable for untoward behavior...and that if Wingard ran again, he might lose a "sure R seat" ..to a challenger D..and that translated into more pressure on Wingard not to run.
9:14 p.m.
Jun 19, '12
I found it a pretty surprising editorial position for the Oregonian, especially after all the chatter about the new hire.
9:38 p.m.
Jun 19, '12
And... he's gone.