UO students: feeble, placid, docile, and indifferent
By Erin McCauley of Eugene, Oregon. Erin is a senior at the University of Oregon studying Family & Human Services and Spanish.
I am writing to express my dismay and outrage over the Oregon University System's unjust decision to fire President Lariviere of the University of Oregon, and to express my concern for the future of the university.
Considering that less than 6% of the University of Oregon's budget is paid for by the state, it is ludicrous that the board has the power to fire the president of the university against the wishes of the student body, the staff and the Eugene community. There was no due process. But what is even more disheartening has been the placid and docile student body reaction.
What attracted me to attend the University of Oregon four years ago was the university's reputation as an epicenter for political activism and free thinkers. It was the eternal energy surging through the streets of Eugene that made this place feel so hopeful, so alive. When I told people that I was moving to Oregon to attend the UO, it meant something. Upon my arrival to Eugene and integration into the community what I have found however, is the opposite. My peers seem to be indifferent and apathetic instead of passionate and profound in thought.
When I heard the board's decision I was outraged, and the more time I spent talking to my peers about this injustice the more outraged I became. Not because I was feeding off of the communal upheaval that I had expected, but because I realized what this place really has become, a museum of activism. The University of Oregon student body used to be an active, politically charged, organized group that stood up against oppressive authoritarianism.
What the student body has become is feeble and docile. The students at the University of Oregon do not care about what is happening around them, to them. They do not care about the injustice that faces them. They are compliant to walk away from the corridor of integrity and to not embrace our history of public unrest. It is when youth truly stop seeking to question, that evil prevails.
There should have been riots in Eugene that momentous night; there should have been outcries. Anger should have poured into the streets and occupied the campus, our campus. But there was no movement, no resistance.
This moment is a catalyst of change for the University of Oregon. The moment we are living in right now will define the future of this community, of this University. We have been nationally embarrassed by the weakness of our resistance. Our professors are up in arms, our community members infuriated, but our students, the very people this effects the most feel nothing, care about nothing. As activism sweeps the UC system and social media is pumping through images of students united screaming, 'Whose university? OUR UNIVERSITY!' the juxtaposition is all the harsher.
It is in this moment that our futures will be decided. This campus may relinquish our last strand of hope and back down from our last chance of noncompliance. Either we will continue our march into meritocracy, or in this moment we will change.
The coming week will tell our fate. Either this campus will stand united and demand to be heard, or we will secure our position in the ranks of indifference. My hope is that twenty years from now when I show someone my degree from the University of Oregon it signifies that I stand for something, it means something.
We must not let ourselves be ushered into the dawning of a new time, the time of compliance. Our road is paved and our future is waiting. This is a plea for the student body to activate. This is a call to arms.
Stand for something!
Dec. 02, 2011
Posted in guest column. |
More Recent Posts | |
Albert Kaufman |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
Kari Chisholm |
Final pre-census estimate: Oregon's getting a sixth congressional seat |
Albert Kaufman |
Polluted by Money - How corporate cash corrupted one of the greenest states in America |
Guest Column |
|
Albert Kaufman |
Our Democrat Representatives in Action - What's on your wish list? |
Kari Chisholm |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
connect with blueoregon
12:45 p.m.
Dec 2, '11
This is a huge generalization. A very large campus cannot be broadly characterized as "the students at the University of Oregon do not care about what is happening around them, to them." I have thousands of examples of the exact opposite.
We have a responsibility to one another to stay informed, stay connected, and tell the story. How are you connecting students who aren't engaged to opportunities? I'm with you in helping 100% of students get engaged... it won't happen magically but we all can play a part in creating the community we want to see.
2:49 p.m.
Dec 2, '11
And please don't misinterpret my interest in engagement to mean only the current situation with the President. I hope students who agree and disagree are talking about that but I agree with the third commenter regarding the need for students to be engaged with community needs.
1:34 p.m.
Dec 2, '11
Fortunately, outrage on the left, just to be outraged, is as meaningful and irresponsible as outrage on the right, ala Tea Party. Talking to others who are outraged, and thus getting more outraged, doesn't mean the outrage is legitimate or reasonable.
RL was not the Czar of the UofO, but was answerable to the Board. Any college President knows that if you ignore the Board, and in fact violate your agreement with them, your job may be in jeopardy. http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-18266-flunk_a_duck.html
2:38 p.m.
Dec 2, '11
So, this dramatic plea of outrage that the University that my wife and I, my parents, and grandparents, and generations of Oregonians paid for is not going to become privatized and turned over to the corporate world seems to have no resonance on campus or elsewhere. I'm glad.
When I was on campus we were protesting and having strikes over the deaths of thousands in Vietnam, not over the privatization of a valuable public resource.
If you're going to find an injustice to address, how about poverty, or hunger, or unemployment?
7:32 p.m.
Dec 2, '11
Erin, perhaps you should spend some time in the real world and less time getting educated beyond your capacity to engage in critical thought. Your school president was a contract employee. His contract was not renewed because: He didn't play nice with others, He didn't follow directions, He didn't follow process, He was insubordinate, and the list goes on. As a contract employee he has no due process for a contract not being renewed or extended. He will paid out through the end of his contract - June 2012.
Calling for rioting, mayhem and destruction in the name of a leader who quite honestly brought more uncertainty to U of O than stability and growth shows a rather unrealistic and immature world view. He also caused the U of O to pay out a $2 million parting gift to coach/AD Bellotti and his $41k/month retirement. I hope you bring a more realistic set of expectations to your work in the real world post graduation.
9:38 a.m.
Dec 3, '11
"There should have been riots in Eugene that momentous night."
Really? Over this?
I see a lot of words about how outraged you are, but I don't see anything about why President Lariviere should not have been fired.
Perhaps you'd get more support if you started with building a case for why this action was wrong, rather than calling for outrage without explaining why anyone should be outraged.
4:46 p.m.
Dec 5, '11
the previous ASUO President was not a fan of the Foundation's plan. the current ASUO President is not, either. while the loudest voices are trying to push the story that Lariviere was beloved by all & his firing was opposed by every Duck in the universe, that's not really true. many of us who love UO also want to see the other state universities (and community colleges) prosper. the Foundation's plan is libertarian ugliness at its worst: we'll take what we can & to hell with you.