We Could Really Use That Billion Right About Now
Jeff Alworth
We learned yesterday that Oregon's unemployment rate spiked in October to 7.3%.
Oregon's total nonfarm payroll employment dropped from 1,725,000 in September to 1,710,900 in October, seasonally adjusted. The largest monthly drop since February 1981 represented 0.8 percent of Oregon's employment, compared with 1.4 percent in 1981 when the work force was smaller.
Since October 2007, the number of unemployed people in Oregon has jumped by 40,458 to 134,096. The state's unemployment rate has risen by 1.9 percentage points this year.
You know what happens when unemployment rises, right? Income tax revenues decrease. This is one of those times when, you know, it might be great to have a little cash socked away. (Actually, we do have a little...very little). As it happens, it was almost exactly one year ago that Oregonians received a check from the state kicking back 1.1 billion dollars. Our budget is about to see a massive hole blown through it, one that wouldn't be nearly so big if we hadn't siphoned off that billion dollars a year ago. In January, Treasurer Randall Edwards wrote an editorial presciently making this point ("And last month, just before Christmas, we sent out a record $1.1 billion kicker even as signs of a recession were on the horizon.").
A couple days ago, Kari asked how we might build a "bigger, stronger, smarter, and more effective progressive movement" in Oregon. I would like to suggest that no progressive legislation that depends on funding--none--can come out of Salem until we get rid of or radically reform the kicker (non-budgetary issues like repealing Measure 36 are another matter).
Even if we do that, our budget depends on two revenue streams--income and property taxes--and one of these is highly volatile. The combination of an unreliable funding structure and the sheer craziness of the kicker create a system that will continue to oscillate between times of boom and bust. If we don't tame this beast, forget about progressive legislation. The first priority of everyone serious about progressive change in Oregon should be to press our legislature to finally roll up their collective sleeves and tackle this problem.
More Recent Posts | |
Albert Kaufman |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
Kari Chisholm |
Final pre-census estimate: Oregon's getting a sixth congressional seat |
Albert Kaufman |
Polluted by Money - How corporate cash corrupted one of the greenest states in America |
Guest Column |
|
Albert Kaufman |
Our Democrat Representatives in Action - What's on your wish list? |
Kari Chisholm |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
connect with blueoregon
Nov 18, '08
Repealing the kicker can go a long way to reducing the volatility of the income tax. If the state simply socked away its surpluses in a rainy day fund instead of sending them back to the taxpayers, we'd be in a much better position to ride out the bad times.
1:29 p.m.
Nov 18, '08
I figure that my per capita share of $700,000,000,000 is around $2,000,000,000, give or take a kopek or two. Half of my share goes to the Oregon Democratic Party. The other half goes to some sort of productive business -- maybe I'd start a solar powered electricity production plant somewhere out in all that lava that covers the middle part of Oregon.
Uhh, you mean I don't get any of that incredible honey? Uhh, who does? No one I know.
3:21 p.m.
Nov 18, '08
I don't suppose it's possible to completely ax the damn thing--it's too popular. But reforming it so it was a rolling average of two years calculated at the end of the biennium--something like that would be a big improvement.
3:45 p.m.
Nov 18, '08
Why not a rolling average of seven years? Seems to me that it should pick up the support of the religious conservatives, even.
Genesis 41:25-36
Nov 18, '08
Instead of "kicker", maybe it should be named "kick new teachers out on the street er" because that's what the end result of this idiocy will be.
I am tired of the whole "it's too popular" "it's the Oregon frontier way of life" crap. We have a government that already balances itself on a table with three legs. In the good years, when we have the ability to start growing a nub or at least save up for that prosthetic limb where the sales tax leg could be, we cut it off and give it back to the masses for a collective downpayment on their next game of video poker.
Give me a break. We need a visionary leader who will stop playing the popularity game and do what's right. Hint: It's not the guy who once drafted a progressive public employee collective bargaining law and is now fishing for electric cars in Japan. I hear dynamite works well, Theodore.
Nov 18, '08
"Why not a rolling average of seven years? Seems to me that it should pick up the support of the religious conservatives, even."
<h2>sure, and maybe we can reinstitute the jubilee with their help as well, redividing all capital equally amongst everyone every 50 years.</h2>