Quick Hits: Scuttlebutt edition

Kari Chisholm FacebookTwitterWebsite

Some tasty morsels to start your weekend off right:

  • Kitz Fan (unverified)
    (Show?)

    John Kitzhaber is famous for dismissing the idea of living in Washington DC.

    I thought Kitzhaber was famous for being Oregon's former Gov., the creator of the Oregon Health Plan, and the founder of the Archimedes Movement? Am I wrong?

    Why go to DC when he can stay here and run for Gov. again!

  • (Show?)

    Pete DeFazio for FAA Boss? Is Pete a licensed pilot? As a private pilot and owner of a small aircraft, I am very interested in who will be the next FAA Administrator. Currently, operators of small, General Aviation (GA) aircraft (ie, most everyone except airliners) pay most of their share of the use of the National Aerospace System (calling control towers and other such services) via a fuel tax (either AvGas, or jet fuel for small GA jets, turboprops, and turbine powered helicopters.) Airliners pay via a combination of services used, fuel taxes and other fees, much like most other large commercial vehicles that exact a much higher strain on a transportation system. The Bushies and the Airlines have for years been trying to change GA to a fee-for-services tax base. This is bad for a number of reasons: It adds tons of complexity with revenue collection; it makes a 120 mph, 1800 lb Piper like mine pay fees similar to a 500 mph, 250,000 lb airliner for a clearance or other flight service; and it might discourage some pilots from using services that support safety of flight due to the unreasonable new expenses. It boils down to this: The public WANTS us pilots to use all safety advantages to keep "unhappy things" from happening, right? And with increased (unnecessary) regulation and costs associated with acquiring and maintaining a pilots license, it is not impossible that it will become too expensive for new pilots to train and achieve the level of competence and experience needed to become airline pilots. More airliners flying (and other commercial aircraft, like public safety, traffic, medevac, etc) require more pilots and crews to operate and service them. The FAA should be promoting careers in aviation science (pilots and maintenance) to keep US aviation healthy and safe. I'll be contacting Rep DeFazio to ask him about his stand on GA and how he thinks it fits into the system.

  • (Show?)

    Actually, Glen, is isn't just "Bushies and the Airlines" who have been looking for new ways to get general aviation aircraft to pay their fair share of the cost of air traffic control, etc. Joseph Stiglitz, chair of the Council of Economic Advisros under Clinton (and subsequently winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics) talks about this issue in his book, The Roaring Nineties.

    I'm not sure where DeFazio is on this, however. I think his main gripe is with the airlines, not private planes, so you may be okay.

  • Sargent (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Damn, it really does suck to be Gordon Smith.

    I'm not a fan of post-election barbs -- that link to a blurb about Smith walking with his head lowered is like kicking sand in his face. What's the point? We won. Sure, Smith voted wrong almost all the time, and we can talk about that for years. Heck, I campaigned against Smith and am as thrilled as anyone that Jeff Merkley is replacing him.

    But I'm also remembering what Jeff Merkley himself did when he replaced Karen Minnis as Speaker of the Oregon House: He sent her flowers. He's a class act. While we don't need to be quite that diplomatic, how's about we say three cheers for winning the election -- and allow Gordon Smith the dignity of moving on with his life without being pestered by a peanut gallery. We have far more interesting things to say about his performance as Senator than snicker because he's sad in a subway station.

  • (Show?)

    Sargent:

    Jeff Merkley is gracious as he becomes Speaker of the House in January, 2007:

    (sorry... was taking pics from the gallery and some are a bit blurry, but you can still see that he's giving her a hug)

    | Pic 1 | Pic 2 | Pic 3 |

  • Sargent (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Thanks for the photos. I had only read about the flowers in a news article and was really impressed.

  • (Show?)

    Not a problem. Whenever I go down to Salem, I try to shoot some pics and do a bit of live blogging. Opening day in '07 happened to be one of the days I was in Salem, and I had a laptop and my camera. So I blogged throughout the day, including the opening sessions of both the state house and senate.

    I hope to head down there again. Hopefully I'll have a car again by then and will be able to go down to Salem multiple times throughout the session. Otherwise, I'll have to rely on when the Bus Project or other folks are heading down there.

  • (Show?)

    Hey Jenni:

    Drop me a note and maybe we can make some plans to ride down for opening day of session together.

  • (Show?)

    Sarge--

    Yeah, some magnaminity is a good thing. And I'm quite sure that Jeff Merkley will do exactlythat.

    But that item came from Washington Post and noted by the Oregonian... a little link on this blog isn't much more of a pile-on.

  • dickey45 (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I think Jenni needs a new camera :)

  • Zarathustra (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Does he care that every progressive in the world wants Richardson at Interior?

  • joel dan walls (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Well, I was really hoping that Harry Kershner would come on here to explain the way that Ayman al-Zawahiri of al Qaida seems to be channeling Ralph Nader: you know, Nader wondered out loud on Election Night whether Barack Obama would be an Uncle Tom, and now al-Zawahiri is out there calling Obama a house Negro.

  • (Show?)

    dickey45:

    Yea, it drove me crazy that those pics were the ones that came out badly. Other ones came out much better. I would like to get a better camera, though, one of these days.

  • RW (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Jenni and Carla: there is a bill being taken back to the leg. this year that I am vitally interested in for many reasons. It's bad legislation, turned a piece of good legislation overdue into a mishmosh cancel-out package.

    I will try to find out when it's going, what it's called now, etc. A vital piece was passed forcing the large, self-insureds to reveal the malpractice records of medical providers above the RN level. It has been a kicking and scratching fight to get that data, but it's rolling now. Great law, huh? Something we can all believe in.

    BUT: attached to it was a crappy piece of business that specifically hid from public view four different kinds of suits - and some providers whose cases (including the influential MD lawmaker whose hands were deep in this legislation, apparently) fit these four key bullet points completely disappeared from view. So now, those charged with doing diligent Quality checks on providers must go to extra expense and effort to acquire the PUBLIC record of malpractice of medical providers in Oregon. The Oregon Medical Board is cost extra money to administer and support hte requests, etc.

    So it is going back for review, and I am thinking I'd like to go down and watch this process. What are the guidelines? Can anyone just show up to be present when a bill of special interest to them is addressed? What is the process of learning where, when, whom?

    It is worth spending PTO or taking leave without pay to be here for this one.

  • (Show?)

    There are typically a number of opportunities for the public to be involved. Bills will usually go through committees, which hold meetings and hearings. I've attended several of these, on topics like payday loan reform and same day voter registration. I was able to speak before the legislators on the committee to let them know my perspective on the issue at hand.

    When the bill is heard on the floor, you can't speak, but you can watch from the gallery. I've done that as well. It can be frustrating to not be able to speak, but it is interesting to see the points made by legislators, the questions asked, and how everyone votes.

    The way to find out where/when/whom is to watch the legislature's web site and watch for when it comes up. You could also contact your legislator's office and ask to be kept up-to-date; however, with their limited staff I've found that keeping an eye out myself has been the best way. It also seems like previously I signed up for emails from specific committees, but I could be wrong. Like most governmental entities, the legislature's web site is an awful mess that I hate navigating.

  • Sargent (unverified)
    (Show?)

    But that item came from Washington Post and noted by the Oregonian... a little link on this blog isn't much more of a pile-on.

    Fair enough. Carry on!

  • rw (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Jenni - thanks for that. It would actually be amusing to run into the LA from my former employer who wanted me fired for mentioning the chilling effect this influential man's contribution to a GOOD bill had on us Regulatory folks. And I did not even know we were a policy chum of his, so it was a pretty irritating lesson in lame-brained lack of perspective on someone I mistakenly thought was a professional. Heh. :)... I would enjoy being able to weigh in on the administrative costs and the lack of actual reason for this hiding of malpractice and license action history from the educated public eye. That might counterbalance the experience of listening to people talk on teh floor who do NOT represent ANY of the points of my own profession... thanks for the tips.

    Am now in a niche where I'm vulnerable and forced to be careful in ways that do not seem right to me. But that is part of where I sit now, and it has its lessons to teach.

    You should see how skillfully this man wrote the information on his web. It was emptiness turned inside out, so transparent I had to shake my head and drink a glass of water to be sure I had read substance and merely missed it for being a newly-minted moron.

    But, alas, no: it was skillful brainwash and bullshit. Speaking much and hiding it all. In plain view.

  • (Show?)

    Getting people to come in and speak on a bill who have personal knowledge, insight, experiences, etc. on a bill are always good.

    For instance, my sister and I went down to Salem and testified on the payday loan reform bill. My sister had taken out a payday loan back when our old landlord lost a payment (and didn't say anything for more than 2 months, which by then I'd lost the mail order slip) and suddenly we had to make a second rent payment days before Christmas. (BTW - the manager's suggestion was that we sell Abby's Christmas presents to make some money).

    She ended up with a payday loan with more than 600% interest, which ended up costing her several times what she borrowed.

    Another time I spoke on same day voter registration. I worked in Multnomah County Elections and I had the experience of having to turn voters away who weren't registered for various reasons - had registered at the DMV and their registration not turned in, registration not turned in through whatever reg drive they'd participated in, had a registration that had been canceled due to not voting for too long, etc.

    In both cases, I was able to speak on personal experiences in regards to the bills, which says more to the committee members than just giving them straight facts and figures.

    Just remember to find out ahead of time how many are on the committee so you can provide your comments in writing (where you can also attach supplemental info like more facts and figures).

  • LT (unverified)
    (Show?)

    "In both cases, I was able to speak on personal experiences in regards to the bills, which says more to the committee members than just giving them straight facts and figures.

    Just remember to find out ahead of time how many are on the committee so you can provide your comments in writing (where you can also attach supplemental info like more facts and figures)."

    It is important to pressure the current House leadership to be better than Minnis was about having scheduled hearings actually happen at the time and place posted online, and only changing that last minute in cases of true emergency.

  • (Show?)

    It is important to pressure the current House leadership to be better than Minnis was about having scheduled hearings actually happen at the time and place posted online, and only changing that last minute in cases of true emergency.

    Jeff Merkley fixed that two years ago.

  • (Show?)

    I have to say that in the '07 session that I didn't have any problems with last minute changes and such like we did in '05. For instance, in '05 we were supposed to have a hearing in Portland on the payday loan reform bill. Needless to say, Minnis canceled it, so you had to go to Salem to testify... which meant less people able to come who had personal experiences with payday loans. Thankfully, some non-profit groups had gathered letters from some of those people and were able to represent them.

  • Zarathustra (unverified)
    (Show?)

    ...payday loan reform...

    It never hurts to remind would be Palin tolerators that one of her very dearest constituencies is the Payday Loan industry!

    <hr/>

connect with blueoregon