A tip of the hat to Steve Novick

Kari Chisholm FacebookTwitterWebsite

You know, I've been part of losing campaigns before. It's no fun. Mostly, you just want to crawl under your bed, and stay there for a long time, maybe with a bottle of tequila.

Losing a primary campaign is even worse. Primaries are brutal; old friends wind up on opposite sides, slinging arrows at each other. It can take a long time, even years, for those wounds to heal.

Which is why I've been so impressed with Steve Novick.

Since the primary, I've seen Steve introduce Jeff Merkley a half-dozen times at various events. His endorsement is strong, his pitch passionate, and he fires up the crowd every time.

Novickformerkley

Y'know, Steve could have done the minimum required -- show up at the post-primary unity event and pack it in. No one would have blamed him.

But he hasn't. He's all over the place for Jeff Merkley.

And his pitch isn't just "Gordon Smith is a bad Senator." Every time, Steve makes it clear: he thinks Jeff Merkley will be a good, strong, progressive Senator - and one that will work hard and work smart for Oregon.

Here's to Steve Novick.

  • (Show?)

    [Full disclosure: My firm built Jeff Merkley's website, but I speak only for myself.]

  • edison (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Of course, Kari. This should come as a surprise to no one. Steve is a classy guy. I look forward to the day when Senator Merkley introduces Candidate Novick in a future campaign.

  • Bob Nisbet (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I hope Steve gets elected to office down the road. He came into the Tualatin Valley Community TV studio and spoke eloquently about ballot measures 56-64 recently.

  • (Show?)

    This should come as a surprise to no one. Steve is a classy guy.

    I think this understates Steve's support. He could have bee a cool classy guy and done 80% of expectations. Even with the knowledge that he is a cool, classy guy, he's exceeded already-high expectations. When you read tea leaves about how a person might govern, these are important tells. If he goes to this effort for a guy who beat him in a tough primary, what do you think he'd do for constituents?

    Hats off--

  • Jack Sullivan (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Steve should move to the west side. Oregon could use a competitive congressional primary in 2010.

  • LT (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Yes, Steve is a class act! Campaigning for the nominee after losing the nomination is a sign of excellent character.

    It should be a lesson to all those bloggers who were so vehement in the primary that the old proverb is correct in saying "You catch more flies with vinegar than by hitting him over the head!".

    Jack is right. Running for office in the Portland area would be a smart thing for Steve to do. But if he plans to run for office in 2010, Steve should start thinking of how to organize a ground operation in whatever district he tries to run in. Whatever some may believe, having enough money to run ads every hour on the hour wouldn't change the conversation between 2 neighbors when one says that a candidate's ad is stupid/not relevant to the office sought. Someone locally saying "yeah, that may not be the world's best ad, but let me tell you about the Steve I know" can be a lot more powerful than any broadcast ad.

    A well organized ground operation which can say "vote for Steve because..." rather than a bunch of bloggers telling anyone who asks questions that they should be ashamed for not being true blue unquestioning Novickians.

    Often in heated campaigns, the candidate is classier than some of the supporters. Glad to see Steve is in that classy category.

  • eat me (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Boy, that's an awesome re-hashing of the primary. You're a profound thinker, LT.

  • (Show?)

    eat me: Boy, that's an awesome re-hashing of the primary. You're a profound thinker, LT.

    If there is ever any doubt that Mr. Novick has always been far far classier than many of his supporters, this post by "eat me" should end all doubt.

  • Robert G. Gourley (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Don't forget, Oregon's going to be needing a great governor soon! One who is really on the side of working folks.

  • lucky to eat me (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Well, It would seem that LT is the commenter who decided to unecessarily dredge up all the all her old primary arguments with her usual delusional observations and strawmen.

    Clearly candidates being classier than their supporters is not exclusive to Steve Novick, Steven, you giant douche-bag.

    If it me was the worst she got, she got off lucky.

  • LT (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Thank you Steven M. "Mr. Novick has always been far far classier than many of his supporters"

    I was not "dredging". Steve might very well make an excellent elected official if he engages the public with a well run campaign.

    But as a friend of mine said last spring, the Senate campaign was not well run. Maybe he and I were both old fogies, but it seems to me (and I believe the Bus Project has proven this as well) that a campaign with a very healthy "ground game", aka grass roots activism from the community level on up, is likely to be more successful than a campaign which says "aren't our commercials great?!" or bloggers claiming anyone who doesn't think their candidate is the greatest thing since sliced bread deserves to be called names.

    I believe Novick for Senate made a major mistake when they hid the excellent poverty video a couple mouse clicks into the website but put the "flaming pants" video on the front page for far too long. Yes, I thought he should have made a commercial out of that poverty video. It was excellent, showing Steve at his best. Attack me for that statement if you wish.

    Steve should run for something less than statewide office and then he would be an elected office holder running for higher office. That is how Mike Kopetski got elected to legislature and then to Congress after losing a congressional primary.

    But then, maybe there are some people here who care less about winning elections than browbeating everyone who disagrees with them.

    No one is OWED a vote. I was impressed by Jeff Merkley before he was Speaker because of a speech I heard him give at a 2006 campaign event in a room where not everyone was a lifelong Democrat.

    If Steve were able to win over voters by doing something similar, he would deserve to win an election. I'm one of those people who looks at how candidates conduct their campaigns. What a concept!

    Folks, if you really want Steve elected to public office in the future, you need to have more of this sort of comment on blogs and in personal conversations:

    Posted by: Bob Nisbet | Oct 7, 2008 6:38:13 AM

    I hope Steve gets elected to office down the road. He came into the Tualatin Valley Community TV studio and spoke eloquently about ballot measures 56-64 recently. ~~~~~~~ and less of the sarcastic attacks against anyone who doesn't say Novick for Senate was a flawless campaign and no one should say otherwise.

    Maybe you've never heard the term constructive criticism?

    I've been to events where a candidate talked to a group of friends and then the friends gave a critique--everything from the substance of the speech to the tone of voice, to whether the speaker could be heard in the back of the room. The people I know consider that as doing a favor to the candidate.

    Maybe some of you consider anything less than "Steve was the perfect candidate" as an insult. If so, we have a major disagreement.

  • (Show?)

    I think we all get what some people think were downfalls in the primary campaign. Let's stop bringing that back up again, as it just causes infighting that we don't need.

    I'm excited to see Steve out working so much for Merkley. Wish I could do more for Jeff as well. Steve's a great guy, and he's acting just like I knew he would - and just like I assured many people he would. He's just that kind of guy. I can't wait to have a chance to vote for him again.

  • (Show?)

    See, LT, the problem I've got is that your "folks" implies that most of us who supported Steve like or engage in such sarcastic attacks on "anyone" who disagrees. Just ain't so.

    There were some frequent commenters here who often made nasty comments that I considered over-the-top substantively and unproductive at best and destructive at worst in this little corner of the world (whose smallness you correctly point out at some times but seem to ignore at others) during the primary.

    But I would have to say that the overwhelming number of such comments came in individual slanging matches with purveyors of over-the-top, sarcastic unproductive commenters on "the other side" who thought they were helping Jeff. They weren't directed for the most part at Merkley supporters in general, any more than the pro-Merkley slangers were attacking Novick supporters in general, mostly.

    This makes your own apparent tendency to wish to generalize now about those of us who happened to support Steve at the time a bit ironic IMO. Your criticism of the way the campaign was run clearly is intended to be constructive & can be taken up in that spirit. Your over-generalizations about people who happened to support Steve don't meet the constructiveness test, though, IMO.

    I've been doing a little phone-banking for Jeff, not as consistently as would be desirable in other circumstances perhaps, & donated the small mite I can afford & have been appreciative about his continued forthrightness on Iraq and more recently on the Big Finance bailout. The latter I think puts paid to some of the suggestions during the primary from some on our side that Jeff would somehow be Chuck Schumer's puppet because of DSCC support, although I will never donate to the DSCC as long as it intervenes in primaries.

    I know at least one strong Novick person (not a blogger) who has done a good bit for Jeff. Another friend who was a Novick person votewise, whom I know mainly from anti-war work, is an energetic and enthusiastic Merkley staffer now -- that's how I ended up doing phoning. I'm confident I "know," at least in the sense of interacting with them here, a good number others who also have contributed in one or more ways to Jeff's campaign, but since don't really know them, so don't know exactly what they've done.

    A lot of us who supported Steve have taken his vigor in supporting Jeff to defeat Gordon Smith and calls to his supporters to do likewise to heart, I believe.

    I appreciate Kari (and Jeff and others) recognizing that vigor on Steve's part.

  • (Show?)

    Well, for the record, I need to say that Steve Novick himself has won me over. While in the heat of the primary, Steve did do things that I didn't like, he has recently shown his true colors, and I sincerely hope to see him in another race - an open seat in which I could wholeheartedly support him.

  • (Show?)

    I'm proud of Steve for being a real trouper. He is every inch the loyal Democrat Jeff (and others here) accused him of NOT being during the primary campaign.

    I wish I could get excited about Jeff as a candidate. Right now I am voting for him because he's a Democrat and that's what I do, but without a lot of excitement. I hope that once he gets into office he will surprise and delight me. I'm counting on it.

  • Daniel Spiro (unverified)
    (Show?)

    First of all, thanks to Kari to acknowledging the contribution that Steve has made to the Merkley cause. I, too, have been pleased to see the extent of Steve's enthusiastic support to the man whom progressives all over the country would like to see represent Oregonians in the Senate, giving the Democrats a clean sweep of west coast Senators.

    Second, as one of Steve's best friends, I can flatly say that nobody I know thinks that Steve ran a flawless campaign. But the words "human" and "flawless" never go together. Everyone makes mistakes. In Steve's case, he clearly did more things right than just about any of us would have expected of a first time candidate. And for him to come as close to beating Merkley as he did, given Merkley's tremendous support from the DSCC, is quite an accomplishment.

    Third, reasonable people can surely disagree about precisely which seat Steve should run for in 2010. But I think all progressives in Oregon need to think about how they can support Steve in whatever office he does seek -- whether it is Governor, Congressman, or mayor of Oregon's version of Wasilla. During that campaign, Steve will surely "make mistakes," and some of his supporters may even defend him when he does ... but I bet that when all the dust is settled, we'll agree that he ran a generally excellent campaign. And if he's elected, he'll make us all proud.

  • (Show?)

    Posted by: Jenni Simonis | Oct 7, 2008 5:18:30 PM

    I think we all get what some people think were downfalls in the primary campaign. Let's stop bringing that back up again, as it just causes infighting that we don't need.

    I couldn't possibly agree more. Thanks, Jenni!!

    There is a time and a place for rationally discussing the good, the bad and the ugly from the primary. Now ain't that time! It's simply NOT productive right now.

    That said... I think Steven Maurer does justice not just to Novick but to objective truth by suggesting that what has gone down SINCE the primary is a key to better understanding what went down DURING the primary. And to that extent he speaks for me too because I have reached the same conclussion.

  • (Show?)

    whether it is Governor, Congressman, or mayor of Oregon's version of Wasilla.

    Funny you should mention that. The town in Oregon whose population is closest to Wasilla is Cottage Grove, Steve's hometown.

  • (Show?)
    But as a friend of mine said last spring, the Senate campaign was not well run.

    As I remember it, he came within just a few percentage points of winning the election, despite being heavily outspent. I think results like that speak pretty well for themselves.

    Doubtless, if everything had gone perfectly, he would have made up that small gap and Jeff Merkley would be campaigning for Steve Novick against Gordon Smith.

  • Ron Buel (unverified)
    (Show?)

    As a strong opponent of Steve Novick in the primary, I am very pleased to see that he is not a sore loser. I thought his attacks on Merkley were over the top. I could easily support Steve Novick for Congress, and perhaps Blumenauer will become Obama's Transportation Secretary and Steve will run and win, and I could support him. I would not support Steve for Governor as Gourley suggests, and I have a long list of reasons why, starting with his lack of administrative or executive experience.

    <hr/>

connect with blueoregon