Quick Hits and Deep Thoughts: Polar Bear Edition
Kari Chisholm
Here's the latest edition, including a bunch of leftover notes from the Democratic Convention:
- Be sure to check out Laura Calvo's notes about the Democratic Convention over at the Just Out blog. Despite her status as a Clinton delegate, she was invited right up front and center at Invesco Field - where she chatted with Nancy Pelosi, Wes Clark, NBC's Ann Curry, CNN's Candy Crowley, etc.
- It seems that, in Denver, Peter DeFazio got a chance to bend the ear of Barack Obama's top economic advisor - says David Sirota.
- If you missed Jeff Merkley's hard-hitting speech at the Democratic Convention, it's right here.
- Something I didn't know. When he's in Washington DC, Congressman Peter DeFazio lives on a boat. And Gordon Smith's home in Bethesda MD is worth more ($3.5 million) than the DC homes of the rest of our entire congressional delegation combined.
- Also in Denver, the DPO debuted the long-awaited video We The People by Adam Klugman and Enrique Arias. Check it out.
- There's been a lot of talk about Sarah Palin's views on social issues - but when it comes to the environment, she's a right-wing radical, too. Blogging at the EcoCompass Blog, local writer Elizabeth Grossman dives in:
With Arctic Sea ice at its lowest point since measurements began - scientists assessing Arctic conditions say what’s happening indicates we’re moving past the point of no return - under Governor Palin the State of Alaska filed suit against the Department of the Interior to stop the Endangered Species Act listing of polar bears. Alaskans don’t need other places telling us what to do, says Palin. Although she’s fished commercially, she supports the Pebble Mine - what would be North America’s largest open pit copper and gold mine - that would threaten Bristol Bay’s wild sockeye salmon run, the largest in the world. ...
As for science in a McCain administration, if his VP has a say as she did during her gubernatorial campaign, it would support teaching creationism alongside of evolution.
More Recent Posts | |
Albert Kaufman |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
Kari Chisholm |
Final pre-census estimate: Oregon's getting a sixth congressional seat |
Albert Kaufman |
Polluted by Money - How corporate cash corrupted one of the greenest states in America |
Guest Column |
|
Albert Kaufman |
Our Democrat Representatives in Action - What's on your wish list? |
Kari Chisholm |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
connect with blueoregon
12:04 p.m.
Sep 4, '08
Full disclosure: My firm built Jeff Merkley's website, but I speak only for myself.
Sep 4, '08
Palin belongs with McCannibal. She'll eat her own. Her husband, touted as an Alaskan Fisherman, has a permit for Bristol Bay. Don't think he's one of the Most Dangerous Catch kind of fishermen. He fishes in the summer with a gill net. It's a fair weather fishery when compared to crabbing. It's can also be equaslly lucrative, however. But she supports the mine just the same. I guess she's planning to get rich in politics, because if the Bristol Bay fishery collapses, as it likely would, her husband's permit won't be worth a dime.
Sep 4, '08
The teaching of creationism as "science" can destroy the USA dominance in biotechnology and medical research. This is equivalent to teaching Greek mythology as the basis of natural science.
If creationism had any relevance to studies of biology, scientists would be flocking to the concept like fruit flies to a rotten peach. Scinetists achieve fame and sometimes fortune by making a scientific case for a new concept. Ther is no conspiracy to "hide truths" as creationists cliek to claim.
Religious orthodoxy likes to portray scientists as closed minded toward alternatives to evolutionary theories, but the truth is that scientist are sceptics until fats or empirical data prove or disprove a point. The abundance of evidence supports evolutionary concepts in many fields of science, not just biology. The number of peer reviewed articles lead to progress in medical science. The supporters of creationism have no credentials as scientists and cannot master modern concepts. It is they who are closed-minded.
Religion has a very poor record when it comes to supporting scientific truths.
1:42 p.m.
Sep 4, '08
Wait a minute, RichW... Are you really saying that this ISN'T how the world was created?
2:24 p.m.
Sep 4, '08
When & where I went to public school, creationism was part of the required subject matter for 8th grade biology, taught in tandem with Darwinism. The teacher did her best to be neutral but for whatever reason the introduction of the Old Testament story of creation in a biology classroom backfired tremendously. Perhaps it was because the windows were transparent and not stained glass or perhaps because the environment of the classroom included so much scientific equipment and posters, but for whatever reason, the creationist theory being taught was loudly and derisively (we were only 8th graders, so subtlety was not our strong suit) attacked by the majority of the students, and even mocked to the point the teacher had to stop the discussion to prevent permanent camps from developing within the classroom. Mind you, this was a school in the middle of snake handler country.
I think teaching the religion of the dominant culture as "truth" shouldn't be happening in schools as a rule, but like other right-wing ideas like knee-jerk deregulation, unaffordable tax cuts for the rich, and supply-side economics as solutions for every ill, the introduction of right-wing ideas is not something we need to be especially afraid of as long as the chance to debunk them exists. Kids are smarter than they generally get credit for and most can smell b.s. a mile a way, not matter what the textbook says. Our salvation from ignorance is that the culture we live in and educate our children in is not ignorant, and not, I should add, completely dependent on public schools to sustain and transmit it.
2:39 p.m.
Sep 4, '08
I thought our biology teacher handled it well. She listed all the major theories and a quick synopsis of each, with a little Q&A time. Then the rest of the time was spent on the leading scientific theories, since we were in a science class.
Sep 4, '08
Does anyone know where Obama stands on Creationism?
The only thing I've heard from Obama's church, Trinity United Church of Christ is: 1) Lord Loves a workin man 2) Don't trust whitey
Sep 4, '08
I went to public school right here in good ol' Portland OR. It was 1961 and High School Biology taught nothing but Darwinism. However,the "Holy Rollers" were allowed to hold meetings and assemblies, utilizing the school auditorium and other rooms
for their own purpose, with no scanning of their agenda.Which was mainly recruitment of lonely and confused teens into their organization.
Sep 4, '08
Science is about formulating TESTABLE hypotheses about how the world works. Religion is about something else entirely.
6:40 p.m.
Sep 4, '08
Goolsbee is coming to Reed next month. Keep your eyes on the banner ads.
9:57 p.m.
Sep 4, '08
Well Dave Hathaway, you haven't done your own independent research on Trinity UCC, clearly. It's the largest congregation in the UCC denomination, formed some decades ago by a merger of the Congregationalists (trinitarian descendants of the New England Puritans) with another denomination. The UCC as a whole is predominantly white. Trinity UCC contributes a share commensurate to its size (i.e. the largest single share) to the denomination's general service and charitable activities, which are not in any sense against "whitey." Over 300 white UCC pastors signed a statement in support of Trinity UCC when the vicious distorted attacks on the church started. Many pastors and other white visitors to the predominantly African-American congregation, including the prominent historian of U.S. religion, Martin Marty, of the University of Chicago, have testified to the warm and gracious reception they have received at the church.
To be a member of the UCC denomination, a Congregation has to accept certain defining theological principles, among which the equal dignity of all human souls before God certainly is one, and broad rules, of which racial non-discrimination certainly is one. The UCC is justly proud of the role of Congregationalists as abolitionists, of providing higher education for black students even in antebellum times in denominationally affiliated institutions like Oberlin, and in the formation of schools, colleges and universities for freedpeople across the South, including Atlanta University and Howard University, after the Civil War.
As the older name Congregationalist implies, a distinguishing feature of this tradition is church polity centered at the level of the congregation (as distinct e.g. from Episcopalianism where decision making power rests in the hands of bishops, again indicated by the name). This high degree of congregational autonomy within the broad principles of the church enables many congregations to have distinctive characters. Trinity UCC fits this pattern in the sense of sharing many features in worship and outlook with "black church" denominations such as the National Baptist Convention or the African Methodist Episcopal Church (and many others), even though not in a primarily black denomination. Despite denominational doctrinal differences "the black church" in this broad sense has common features rooted in the experience of enslavement and escape from bondage, including a strong orientation toward the Old Testament (as seen from within Christianity) with its narratives of slavery, liberation and prophecy, distinctive preaching and musical styles, and so on. Trinity UCC's sharing in this tradition no more means it says "don't trust whitey" than did the Rev'd Martin Luther King, Jr.'s sharing in that tradition, which he absolutely did. That framing is a negative way to characterize what really is a stress on self-reliance and self-help, in the face of a world and historical realities in which white people in general have often been hostile and only very rarely been entirely reliable.
In its congregational life, Trinity UCC has adopted (and no doubt evolved, changed, and internally debated) some ideas that come out of the tradition of black liberation theology developed during and after the height of the Civil Rights movement, which reinforced foci characteristic of the broad African-American religious tradition: focus on prophecy and liberation, the necessity of self-reliance, and the right to self-definition.
White Americans have tended to have a deep ambivalence about black autonomy. For most of pre-U.S. and U.S. history most whites wanted to segregate blacks away from themselves, but then tended to get nervous about what the black people were doing over there on their own (most profoundly in white fears of slave rebellions), a dilemma met by insistence on rituals of subservience and a "right" of white oversight. In recent years this ambivalence has taken the form of criticizing black people for allegedly not taking personal responsibility or doing enough by way of self-help, and then criticizing them for emphasizing self-reliance and organizing for self-help in the "wrong" ways.
Black liberation theology, in its address to worldly matters such as the organization of churches and also the question of the meaning of liberation, of true freedom, in light of U.S. history, rejects both the rituals of subservience and the presumption by whites of a "right" to supervise or control black people's self-definitions. By rejecting these pillars of the long history of white supremacy, it makes many people still culturally influenced by that history profoundly nervous.
You apparently are among them.
<hr/>As to creationism, I believe the UCC is among the Christian denominations that no longer makes biblical literalism one of its tenets. It would surprise me greatly if Barack Obama believed in creationism or rejected Darwinism, and it would not surprise me if one reason for choosing a UCC congregation from among the many black church options in Chicago, many of which are fundamentalist, was that Trinity UCC wasn't biblically literalist.
Sep 4, '08
Naomi Klein wrote that Goolsbee is another one of the Milton Friedman Chicago Boys (they overthrew Allende to put Pinochet's brutal regime in power... well, of course, they had military hacks do it for them). Chicago School Economics are the foundation of what I remember from Reagan's days as "Reaganomics" or "trickle-down-economics". You remember, that lovely theory that makes more money for the rich, so they can make more money and then buy politicians so they don't pay taxes either?
Obama has been talking a LOT about the free market, how he's a big fan of the market. Does that mean selling off public resources? Since we're not facing a military "shock", I am afraid that Obama might try What Klein calls "voodoo politics" -- and sell out much like Clinton did once he learned how bankrupt the country had become under Reagan and Bush I.
Granted, Goolsbee does have some exceptions, not as much a hardliner. But economics is what drives all policies, everything in civic life, really determines who eats and who doesn't. So, I'd rather Obama was "moderate" on social issues than economics.
This makes me nervous. Do we have any econ bloggers out there who can give some more information?
And what exactly does DeFazio have in common with Goolsbee?
<hr/>