Being a mother and an elected official

Editor's note: On the post about potential candidates to replace Darlene Hooley, several commenters noted the lack of women being discussed. As part of that conversation, the following comment was posted by Rep. Sara Gelser (D-Corvallis.) Discuss.

As a young mother serving in the Legislature while raising four kids (ranging in age from 6-13) I can tell you it is a great experience. I first started serving on the Corvallis School Board when my youngest was 3 months old (and still nursing, as she did for nearly three years). At the time, the others were 11 months old, 3 years old and my oldest was in kindergarten.

I love my children, and I love my job just as do working professional women everywhere. If you are ready to serve, do it! It is possible to be an involved and loving mother, and a dedicated elected official at the same time. You'll make your kids proud, expose them to all sorts of new experiences (mine loved the chance to do a mock debate in the House chamber after hours, and my son is one of the few kids in the state whose resume includes interrupting the Governor during a news interview to ask him if he likes pirates!), and at the same time bring a much needed perspective to policy making.

We need you! Don't wait! If you know of any young mothers considering public office at any level, I am happy to talk to any of them about the experience of juggling motherhood and public service. It is well worth it.


  • (Show?)

    Sara,

    I agree. Although I am just a City Councilor, the experience has expanded my own children's view of politics. They were older than yours when I started, but it has made my daughters more interested in the world around them and has encouraged them to be more aware of events and politics. And, as a teacher, it has opened new doors for many of my students to meet and talk to various officials and politicians around the state.

  • (Show?)
    my son is one of the few kids in the state whose resume includes interrupting the Governor during a news interview to ask him if he likes pirates!

    Well, does he? How could you leave that out?!

    %^>

  • Larry McD (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I've always thought being the mother of several children was the perfect training for dealing with legislative bodies on every level. The next best is several years as a kindergarten teacher.

  • (Show?)

    I've always thought being the mother of several children was the perfect training for dealing with legislative bodies on every level. The next best is several years as a kindergarten teacher.

    Heh..I've got both of those on my resume'. (I have two kids, which is less than "several". But they're both teenagers now so it sort of counts)

    I don't know that I'll ever run for elected office. I'm not sure my personality suited for governance. But I love seeing mothers taking part in public service at all levels.

    When I chose to go to work for Jeff Merkley's U.S. Senate campaign--I did a cost-benefit analysis of being away from my kids a lot for 16 months vs trying to really make a difference for our state and country. Micro vs macro, if you will. It's been a dream of mine to push myself beyond blogging into a campaign, to stretch myself into new areas and work for someone I really believe in. And while it has it's difficulties, it's worth it knowing that my work has a great likelihood of putting our country in the right direction.

    As it turns out, my son has had the opportunity to volunteer for the campaign, participating in some really great stuff. He loves politics (apple doesn't fall far, don'tcha know). The hands-on experience he'll continue to get when coming to work with me will be invaluable to him.

    I'd encourage any mom who has a passion for something to go after her dream. I've been doing it since August. My kids are proud of me and I'm proud of me for going after it. It can be a lot of extra work, but it's worth it.

    Carla--Netroots Outreach, Jeff Merkley for Oregon

  • (Show?)

    Thanks Sara, this is interesting and inspiring. You are absolutely right that we need women who are mothers of children as candidates and officials if the circumstances of their lives allow it.

    Assuming that political women often will have political spouses, we should encourage activist men (or female partners) to give mothers the same support at home that wives of male politicians long have given them.

    Conversely, we should honor decisions by either women or men to put families first at given stages, if that's what they decide works in their lives.

  • (Show?)

    One of the key challenges in our system is that seniority makes a huge difference - either formally (in Congress) or informally (everywhere else).

    I think it was Geraldine Ferraro who once noted that women tend to run for office after they've raised their kids while men... "graduate from law school and think they're ready to run for Congress."

    That's a bit overstated, but not far off the mark. I'd love to see a study of the average age of rookie members of Congress - and our Legislature... I'm willing to bet the average age at election of women is much higher.

    If we're going to see a politics where women and men not only hold roughly equal numbers of seats - but have roughly equal amounts of power... then we need to encourage women, as Sara does in this post, to run now. Don't wait!

  • Rep. Sara Gelser (unverified)
    (Show?)

    As Chris Lowe mentioned, for all who serve that are parents, the task is greatly eased by supportive partners. This is certainly true in my case. I'm very fortunate to have a husband who cares deeply about Oregon, and supports my efforts to serve. We look at it as a family project more than anything else.

    I think it would be naive to suggest that there wouldn't be tremendous challenges for single parents (be they men or women) of young children to serve. However, Chris is right--- we need to support all who are willing to seve-- be they men or women-- when they are ready to do so.

    I also could not agree more about honoring those who choose to put their families first at any stage of life. It is just important to also remember that you can serve and not be choosing to put your family last. That is the age old bind that professional women find themselves in. If they stay home to care for their children, they are looked down upon for not participating in the marketplace.

    We must recognize the tremendous skill, patience, energy, and expertise that goes into being an "at home" parent. Having done that too, I can tell you that is the most difficult job I ever had, and ever will, have. So to all the moms and dads at home, my hat's off to you!

    When mothers are in the workforce (especially with young children), they are criticized for "not putting their families first." In fact, when I first ran for the Legislature in 2004, a communty leader widely regarded as a progressive shocked me when he said he could not vote for me. He said he appreciated my positions on the issues, he thought I was smart, and he was sure I could be effective in the Legislature. However, he said, he could not vote for a woman that didn't know how to keep her commitments.

    I asked him what he meant, and he said that with four children under the age of 6, surely I had meant to love and parent them when I had them. However, since I chose to run for the Legislature I was abandoning them and that was a clear sign that I could not be trusted to keep my commitments. Needless to say, I was flabbergasted. I saw no reason why I could not raise my children and make policy for the state of Oregon at the same time! Just as men have for ages, it is possible for women to do both.

    Too often women running for office are given the messages I was from that not-so-progressive man. Although it often isn't quite so direct, it is the kind of message that cuts pretty deep. That's why we need to be counteracting those messages by telling women that they CAN run, and they can be great elected officials and great mothers all at the same time.

    We make policy at the local, state and federal level that impact women, families and children. Their voices need to be at the table.

  • Rep. Sara Gelser (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I don't know how to edit, but there was a typo above. When I first ran, I had four children under the age of 9 (not six, as typed).

  • (Show?)

    I wrote an article on this subject for Mothers Movement Online in which I mentioned a poll done by Deloitte and Touche that said voters were more comfortable with fathers with young children running for office than mothers.

    The article (if I can figure out this hyperlink thingy) is at

  • (Show?)

    Nope -- I didn't figure it out -- someday I will...

  • (Show?)

    Sara, good for you. It's tough doing a regular job with kids, much less serving in office. What did you do for child care--is the Legislature progressive enough to have child care onsite in the Capitol?

  • (Show?)

    Carla,

    Yes it is -- thanks so much!

    Kristin

  • (Show?)

    the people in Corvallis and Benton County who know Sara and her terrific husband know how lucky they are to have this wonderful team in their midst. the Gelsers are fortunate (i don't think i'm putting words into Sara's mouth) to have supportive family and friends, people who make sure they have the love and care they need to do what they do. the lesson is that a mom, even of young children, can do "big" and amazing things with the care and support of those around her. those of us who know such women (and men, too, of course; the experience of Barack and Michelle Obama, as they have shared it with America as they've campaigned, makes it clear that a loving father needs the active support of his wife and support network, too) should do all we can to support them as they pursue their dreams. Oregon is lucky to have Sara, but who knows what other great women leaders are out there and only in need of some good child support to step forward!

  • (Show?)

    Sara,

    That's a very disturbing story you tell about your community leader acquaintance. If I inadvertantly reproduced the canard and double standard applied to women that you describe, I didn't mean to do so.

    In a funny way I think possibly women in public life end up becoming a focus of guilt on the part of many parents of both sexes who need to have two-income families and / or want to have meaningful work as part of their lives. Our social structure & the ways jobs are constructed push everyone to overwork relative to family life. But the way forward is not to try to impose historically misleading gender stereotypes that deny society the benefits of women's talents in addition to restrictions they place on individual women. It is to find ways to create more flexibility for individuals of both sexes and to get away from punishing people for the choices they make.

    It's a tough nut to crack, because there are so many incentives for employers to make "putting work first" the criterion for rewards of different sorts.

    My vague utopian ideas about it involve a stronger social wage to reduce dependence on specific employers, and a hope that the changes we will need to make to deal with the ecoological crisis will lead to paying people less in relation to making and selling stuff toward work that helps us cooperate with one another better or find joys in things that aren't objects. How to get from here to there I don't know and numbers of things seem to trend in the other direction, esp. the apotheosis of "business models" as the be all and end all of how to organize activities.

    Anyway, keep doing the good work Sara.

  • Lisa (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Great topic, Sara, thanks for posting and inspiring. There are indeed trade-offs while parenting, but having parents in elected office is so very important to the public policies we wind up with that affect families. You go! And thanks to your husband for being in it, too - I have found that to be the only thing that allwos me the time to even look beyond my job and my children. Ben Cannon is my Rep and - while I liked him a lot anyway - I couldn't be happier that he has a new baby, 'cause our issues will be on his mind and (hopefully) help get them to the table.

    Another aspect of the 'parents in politics' conversation is the citizen activism piece. For those of us not inclined toward elected office but very interested in playing an active role in the policy development process (beyond mere voting), it can be challenging with one child asking you to cut Jupiter out of construction paper (brown, Mommy, not yellow!), your boss wanting you to meet a deadline, and your other child "excluded" from day care because she vomited! Attending the local town hall meeting - with your partner stuck putting 'em all to bed (if you've got that kind of cover) - doesn't quite hit the top of the "to do" list, unfortunately. It's hard enough to find the time to thoughtfully formulate an opinion, read more than headlines, unless everyone in the house is deeply sleeping!

    So, not to be completely self-serving here, but I write for a Portland parent activism blog called Activistas (http://urbanmamas.typepad.com/activistas/), an offshoot of urbanMamas. Our purpose is to inform, inspire, & connect busy parents to raise our collective voices for change to create a more family-friendly state and ultimately, nation. Yes, there's Moms Rising and a host of other groups pushing what I call the mamagenda, and we're so glad they're busy on all this, but we're more local, more personal, and as a result, make in-person connections so when the big opportunity comes (paid leave needs support in Salem!), we know where to turn, who'll drive to Salem with us and pack the committee hearings. Feedback welcome - we're almost a year old and full of great ideas (just not time). It's a unique crowd, we parents of young children. And we've a lot of changes to make - between 1 and 3 a.m., mostly :-)

    Is there a list of state reps with kids under 18??

  • Ben Cannon (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Is there a list of state reps with kids under 18??

    I can't give you an authoritative list, but the wall of the Democratic caucus room in the State Capitol includes a bunch of framed photos of the children of House Democrats. And off the top of my head, I know these state reps have kids under 18:

    Jeff Merkley Mary Nolan Suzanne Bonamici Dave Hunt Mike Schaufler Peter Buckley Chris Edwards Sara Gelser Scott Bruun Bruce Hanna Greg Smith Kim Thatcher

    Also ... Rep. Brian Clem had his first child just a few weeks ago, and Rep. Chip Shields is expecting any day! My daughter is eight months old.

    -Ben Cannon, State Representative District 46

  • (Show?)

    I'd heard about Rep. Clem's new baby, but not about Rep. Shields. Congrats to his family!

  • Rep. Sara Gelser (unverified)
    (Show?)

    A few more: David Edwards Ron Maurer (also has four kids) Sherrie Sprenger Brian Boquist

    <hr/>
notable comment

connect with blueoregon