Promising Signs for Portland's Homeless

At the end of January two years ago, outreach agencies took part in a count of Portland's homeless and found  2,355 people.  The count was a part of the city's Ten-Year Plan to End Homelessness, led by Commissioner Erik Sten.  They repeated the experiment again this year, and guess what?

City Commissioner Erik Sten, who spearheaded the plan in December 2004, said last month’s unduplicated count of people sleeping outside in Multnomah County and the cities of Portland and Gresham came to 1,438....  That’s a drop of 917 people, or 39 percent.

Both counts were taken during the last week of January. Fifty-seven outreach agencies took part in the count two years ago, tallying everyone who slept on the street, in a vehicle or an abandoned building.

Even more impressive is the drop in those termed "chronically homeless"--being homeless for more than a year or more than three times during the last three years--where the decrease was 70%, from 1,284 to 386.  What's more, the number of agencies participating in the count this year represented a nearly four-fold increase to 200--evidence that the 2007 count was more comprehensive.

The pilot programs cost $3 million, and Sten plans to seek permanent funds to continue funding for the effort.

Discuss.

(Hat tip to LoadedOrygun, who posted on this earlier today.)

  • Christine Newkirk (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Point of accuracy: chronic homelessness, as defined by HUD, is limited to unaccompanied disabled individuals who have either been homeless for a year or more or had four (not three) episodes of homelessness over the past three years.

    Portland was not the only city in Oregon to conduct a homeless count in January. In fact, these counts are required in all communities which receive HUD funding to address homelessness. Sadly, not all of the communities in the state have the support of local elected officials or the network of service providers needed to be able to show such sharp drops in numbers of chronically homeless people. Rural communities in particular face challenges in providing long-term affordable housing solutions--it's not just a Portland problem, and federal funding priority is given to areas with higher population density.

    Anecdotally, one of the rural homeless counts I was involved in this year showed a 300%+ increase in homeless individuals and families from 2006. Has the problem of poverty and lack of support networks grown that much in a year? I sincerely hope not. What I have seen is that rural communities are becoming more aware of homelessness, thanks in no small part to the success of 10-year plans such as Portland's and others around the nation, and in some cases, momentum and interest is building to a point that there is greater community participation in the actual process of counting, and thus more complete numbers.

    I'd like to see permanent funding for Portland's homeless programs; I'd also like to see permanent funding for homeless programs in smaller communities that are tackling similar challenges, but with a lot fewer resources and a lot less fanfare.

  • (Show?)

    Christine, I relied on the Portland Tribune story when I posted this, and the language they used was "four or more times during the last three years." For brevity, I used "more than three times"--sorry if this was not clear.

  • Roxanne Bruns (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Hmmm, Im not confident in the count. 1) it certainly fails to meet any sort of scientific criteria and 2) it doesnt seem true to my experience. I've been in the metro area for seven years now and it seems to me that there are more people on the streets than when I came.

  • sigmund seamonster (unverified)
    (Show?)

    [insulting and meaningless comment removed. -editor]

  • (Show?)

    Hmmm, Im not confident in the count. 1) it certainly fails "to meet any sort of scientific criteria and 2) it doesnt seem true to my experience. I've been in the metro area for seven years now and it seems to me that there are more people on the streets than when I came."

    that wasn't the question--the comparison is to two years ago, not seven. Seven years ago the dam hadn't burst yet.

  • Phil Jones (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I don't think Portland's civic leaders have quite awakened to the fact that feeding, housing and coddling transients only leads to more of them coming for the comforts of free support. Anyone who doesn't believe there is a network of communication among homeless people is deceiving themselves. The word gets around fast all over the country as to where the best place to live at the public's expense is accomodated.

    I'd bet if such a thing as a 'transients guide to best free living' existed, Portland would be rated #1.

  • Israel Bayer (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Smoke and mirrors.

    The count has been administered differently ever time they count. The funny thing about a homeless count and government wheels are they put this stuff out as fact. They counted people on a cold, shitty night. There were hardly any outreach workers counting in North, and NE.

    40% decrease in homelessess - that's a joke and one that will bite people in the butt when they can't explain why homelessness has increased in the coming years.

  • Israel Bayer (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Phil - you're full of it! Do you think it's fun to sleep in the rain and the cold? Give me a break!

  • Phil Jones (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Israel - Of course it's no fun to sleep outside in Portland's winters, but most southern cities have dealt with transients much better than Portland has done.

    Go to Phoenix, San Diego or Houston and see if homeless people are allowed to accost downtown citizens as they are here in Portland.

  • (Show?)

    If that's the case, God bless Portland. In Phoenix as recently as 2000 they simply arrested homeless people for being homeless, and they are woefully short on beds in Maricopa County as I understand it--only a bit over 10% of needed capacity.

    The same is true in San Diego--they're arrested for "illegal lodging." Well, DUH.

    Both Houston and Phoenix are on the Nat'l Coalition for the Homeless' "Meanest Cities" list.

    There's no evidence I know of that supports the claim that directly links homeless policy to the number of homeless. If you have some, bring it on. "It's only common sense" does not qualify.

  • (Show?)

    Israel, I heard you make that comment in the Trib about the poor process, but you haven't cited any real data. You're one of the experts--can you give any reason why this group failed to find the homeless?

  • (Show?)

    Go to Phoenix, San Diego or Houston and see if homeless people are allowed to accost downtown citizens as they are here in Portland.

    There's a downtown in Phoenix and in Houston?

  • Phil Jones (unverified)
    (Show?)

    http://www.coppersquare.com/downtown-phoenix-parking.html

  • Israel Bayer (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Jeff,

    First off, the BHCD and outreach workers are doing an amazing job. I don't mean this to be a bad reflection on the great work people are doing.

    It's my educated guess, my opinion. Saying that, without naming names I was told they didn't have a lot of outreach workers counting in North and NE where a lot of people are camping out. Also, I think it's fair to say anytime you have a government agencies pusing a political agenda like the 10-year plan to end homelessness and it comes out with a 2-page press release (no report as of yet) saying they have seen a 40% decline in something we should be able to question that - especially when you work on the front lines of something and you haven't noticed the lack of madness, nor the people sleeping out on the street.

    More so, just because you have outreach workers and agencies counting people doesn't mean it's an accurate count and should be taken as fact. You're talking about a population that is forced to hide 364 days of the year, and then all of the sudden on that one day we are suppose to know where they all sleep out. While I don't disagree with the #'s counted, nor the amount of people that have been housed - I still find it hard to believe, 40%...

    Concerning "chronic homelessness" - check these out.

    The NPACH has a great perspective on the chronic homeless definition.

  • National policy & Advocacy Council on Homelessness
  • Questions and Answers About Expanding HUD’s Definition of Homelessness