Promising Signs for Portland's Homeless
At the end of January two years ago, outreach agencies took part in a count of Portland's homeless and found 2,355 people. The count was a part of the city's Ten-Year Plan to End Homelessness, led by Commissioner Erik Sten. They repeated the experiment again this year, and guess what?
City Commissioner Erik Sten, who spearheaded the plan in December 2004, said last month’s unduplicated count of people sleeping outside in Multnomah County and the cities of Portland and Gresham came to 1,438.... That’s a drop of 917 people, or 39 percent.
Both counts were taken during the last week of January. Fifty-seven outreach agencies took part in the count two years ago, tallying everyone who slept on the street, in a vehicle or an abandoned building.
Even more impressive is the drop in those termed "chronically homeless"--being homeless for more than a year or more than three times during the last three years--where the decrease was 70%, from 1,284 to 386. What's more, the number of agencies participating in the count this year represented a nearly four-fold increase to 200--evidence that the 2007 count was more comprehensive.
The pilot programs cost $3 million, and Sten plans to seek permanent funds to continue funding for the effort.
Discuss.
(Hat tip to LoadedOrygun, who posted on this earlier today.)
Feb. 27, 2007
Posted in in the news 2007. |
More Recent Posts | |
Albert Kaufman |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
Kari Chisholm |
Final pre-census estimate: Oregon's getting a sixth congressional seat |
Albert Kaufman |
Polluted by Money - How corporate cash corrupted one of the greenest states in America |
Guest Column |
|
Albert Kaufman |
Our Democrat Representatives in Action - What's on your wish list? |
Kari Chisholm |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
connect with blueoregon
Feb 27, '07
Point of accuracy: chronic homelessness, as defined by HUD, is limited to unaccompanied disabled individuals who have either been homeless for a year or more or had four (not three) episodes of homelessness over the past three years.
Portland was not the only city in Oregon to conduct a homeless count in January. In fact, these counts are required in all communities which receive HUD funding to address homelessness. Sadly, not all of the communities in the state have the support of local elected officials or the network of service providers needed to be able to show such sharp drops in numbers of chronically homeless people. Rural communities in particular face challenges in providing long-term affordable housing solutions--it's not just a Portland problem, and federal funding priority is given to areas with higher population density.
Anecdotally, one of the rural homeless counts I was involved in this year showed a 300%+ increase in homeless individuals and families from 2006. Has the problem of poverty and lack of support networks grown that much in a year? I sincerely hope not. What I have seen is that rural communities are becoming more aware of homelessness, thanks in no small part to the success of 10-year plans such as Portland's and others around the nation, and in some cases, momentum and interest is building to a point that there is greater community participation in the actual process of counting, and thus more complete numbers.
I'd like to see permanent funding for Portland's homeless programs; I'd also like to see permanent funding for homeless programs in smaller communities that are tackling similar challenges, but with a lot fewer resources and a lot less fanfare.
4:57 p.m.
Feb 27, '07
Christine, I relied on the Portland Tribune story when I posted this, and the language they used was "four or more times during the last three years." For brevity, I used "more than three times"--sorry if this was not clear.
Feb 27, '07
Hmmm, Im not confident in the count. 1) it certainly fails to meet any sort of scientific criteria and 2) it doesnt seem true to my experience. I've been in the metro area for seven years now and it seems to me that there are more people on the streets than when I came.
Feb 27, '07
[insulting and meaningless comment removed. -editor]
12:13 a.m.
Feb 28, '07
Hmmm, Im not confident in the count. 1) it certainly fails "to meet any sort of scientific criteria and 2) it doesnt seem true to my experience. I've been in the metro area for seven years now and it seems to me that there are more people on the streets than when I came."
that wasn't the question--the comparison is to two years ago, not seven. Seven years ago the dam hadn't burst yet.
Feb 28, '07
I don't think Portland's civic leaders have quite awakened to the fact that feeding, housing and coddling transients only leads to more of them coming for the comforts of free support. Anyone who doesn't believe there is a network of communication among homeless people is deceiving themselves. The word gets around fast all over the country as to where the best place to live at the public's expense is accomodated.
I'd bet if such a thing as a 'transients guide to best free living' existed, Portland would be rated #1.
Feb 28, '07
Smoke and mirrors.
The count has been administered differently ever time they count. The funny thing about a homeless count and government wheels are they put this stuff out as fact. They counted people on a cold, shitty night. There were hardly any outreach workers counting in North, and NE.
40% decrease in homelessess - that's a joke and one that will bite people in the butt when they can't explain why homelessness has increased in the coming years.
Feb 28, '07
Phil - you're full of it! Do you think it's fun to sleep in the rain and the cold? Give me a break!
Feb 28, '07
Israel - Of course it's no fun to sleep outside in Portland's winters, but most southern cities have dealt with transients much better than Portland has done.
Go to Phoenix, San Diego or Houston and see if homeless people are allowed to accost downtown citizens as they are here in Portland.
9:53 a.m.
Feb 28, '07
If that's the case, God bless Portland. In Phoenix as recently as 2000 they simply arrested homeless people for being homeless, and they are woefully short on beds in Maricopa County as I understand it--only a bit over 10% of needed capacity.
The same is true in San Diego--they're arrested for "illegal lodging." Well, DUH.
Both Houston and Phoenix are on the Nat'l Coalition for the Homeless' "Meanest Cities" list.
There's no evidence I know of that supports the claim that directly links homeless policy to the number of homeless. If you have some, bring it on. "It's only common sense" does not qualify.
10:26 a.m.
Feb 28, '07
Israel, I heard you make that comment in the Trib about the poor process, but you haven't cited any real data. You're one of the experts--can you give any reason why this group failed to find the homeless?
10:28 a.m.
Feb 28, '07
Go to Phoenix, San Diego or Houston and see if homeless people are allowed to accost downtown citizens as they are here in Portland.
There's a downtown in Phoenix and in Houston?
Feb 28, '07
http://www.coppersquare.com/downtown-phoenix-parking.html
Feb 28, '07
Jeff,
First off, the BHCD and outreach workers are doing an amazing job. I don't mean this to be a bad reflection on the great work people are doing.
It's my educated guess, my opinion. Saying that, without naming names I was told they didn't have a lot of outreach workers counting in North and NE where a lot of people are camping out. Also, I think it's fair to say anytime you have a government agencies pusing a political agenda like the 10-year plan to end homelessness and it comes out with a 2-page press release (no report as of yet) saying they have seen a 40% decline in something we should be able to question that - especially when you work on the front lines of something and you haven't noticed the lack of madness, nor the people sleeping out on the street.
More so, just because you have outreach workers and agencies counting people doesn't mean it's an accurate count and should be taken as fact. You're talking about a population that is forced to hide 364 days of the year, and then all of the sudden on that one day we are suppose to know where they all sleep out. While I don't disagree with the #'s counted, nor the amount of people that have been housed - I still find it hard to believe, 40%...
Concerning "chronic homelessness" - check these out.
The NPACH has a great perspective on the chronic homeless definition.
Feb 28, '07
Giggle.
In his bio he writes, "...and of course I went to Reed College."
Feb 28, '07
*That was meant for an entirely different conversation. Damn tabbed windows.
Feb 28, '07
Phil, what exactly is your idea of an alternative? If people don't have the means to provide for themselves, somebody else has to so shoppers don't have to deal with being accosted. That's what it's really all about. Fortunately, some people in this world actually do have a genuine sense of justice and compassion for those that have to struggle to for something so small as common decency from others.
What the city should also be reporting, is how much money it's saving via fewer emergency room admissions, etc, through the successful reduction of chronic homeless persons on the street as a result of this most recent effort to end homelessness.
Feb 28, '07
If we took a fraction of the budget for the Iraq War, we could have a federal jobs program similar to the one in the 1930's. The new CCC could rebuild and repair the crumbling roads, bridges and other infrastructure.
Since we don't have such a Federal program, perhaps a State program to employ homeless people in ability-rated jobs that would help rebuild and beautify our State's Parks, buildings or roads could be instituted. Those on State welfare could be made to work at least part time for nonprofit organizations doing "volunteer" type work. Housing could be built that would provide basic shelter and food.
IMO, anyone under the age of 60 who refuses to work an easy job part time should be given a one-way bus ticket to another state and told not to return unless they wish to work.
I think there are many solutions to homelessness and unemployment if legislators would start seriously discussing the issue.
Feb 28, '07
"...could be made to work..." Phil Jones
Made to work? Why would you want to make, as in coerce or force somebody to work? That's an almost guaranteed way to get the worst performance from somebody unless you're going to make the alternative something on the order of imprisonment, torture, or death. Up for that Phil?
Make safe, decent work, or in some cases, something slightly less than that an opportunity, a priveledge to be respected, and many people would be surprized to find just how many people would love to have such work.
Work's good. In the absence of abuse and exploitation, work gives those that have it, health and self esteem, even help towards a little happiness.
Feb 28, '07
"Those on State welfare could be made to work at least part time for nonprofit organizations doing "volunteer" type work."
Not sure what you mean exactly by "State welfare." But what is commonly referred to as "welfare" is the TANF program - and recipients ARE already made to work 30 hours per week to receive it. With a monthly TANF grant of $420/month (Oregon's standard for a mother and a child), that works out to about $3.25/hour. Is that fair enough for you?
It's pretty difficult to find or keep a job when you're homeless. Getting people into stable housing is usually a crucial first step to getting those that are capable of working back on their feet.
I'm really sick and tired of the attitude that ALL homeless (or the poor) don't want to work - that they thrive on "sucking off the system." We really need to get past this blame-the-victim mentality. Sure, there are some scammers - just like in every walk of life - but all people who aren't well off aren't that way simply because of some character flaw.
Mar 2, '07
all of this talk about homelessness and still there is no real discussion (at least from our business and political leaders) about wages and how they have failed to keep up with the cost of living. no real discussion about the outlandish price of housing. and certainly not enough hard talk about reigning in the greed that has tarnished and all but ruined the health insurance industry.
there is no reason why we cannot house everyone in need of housing. it's not done because of this "rugged individualism" mentality. it's not done because we think it's more important to fight in wars and dominate the world with our values of "democracy" and "freedom". it's not done because corporate profit has moved up on the value scale, above and beyond human decency and worth. it's not done because if you are mentally ill and homeless and do not have the money or insurance, you will be turned away at private hospitals and county mental health agencies (happens here in corvallis at least).
we really want to fix our social ails? we need to get out of our heads and egos for awhile. that's right--that means get in touch with our "touchy/feely" side....redefine our values and remember that we are all equally worthy of having our basic survival needs met irregardless of what is our income/bank account balance.
Mar 2, '07
i forgot to include an article (published in february 2006) that discusses how the census bureau comes up with its poverty statistics. i forwarded it to freedomworks (i agree with you kari--they are slimeballs). afterall, they claim poverty stats are down and for the rest of the downtrodden, all they need to do is try harder! http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/2513/
and to the poster who said if you are under 60 and you refuse to work an easy (who, by the way, defines "easy"?) part-time job, you can leave the state. i have a better idea. how about if you support the policies that have eliminated living wage jobs, if you support the policies that have allowed the slow dismantling of the middle class, if you support the policies that have allowed the wealthiest to increase their wealth while the middle and lower incomes have seen a stagnation or decline in their real income and if you support the policies that have allowed corporate ceo's see their profits rise drastically while jobs are cut and workers salaries and benefits fall into the toilet, YOU can leave the state.
just kidding of course (about you leaving the state) but hopefully you see the point.
Mar 2, '07
I know it's a little late in the string, but here is Street Roots take on the count.
Mar 3, '07
Hey, if they hadn't built the tram so the rich doctors can ride from their multimillion $ condos up to their work, they would have been able to spend approx. $27,343 to take care of the bum problem in this town. Way to go, progressives!! Now go pat yourselves on the back, give yourself a bigger salary and better PERS benefits.
Mar 3, '07
Hey, I have a progressive idea.... Why don't they make the homeless sign an agreement not to harass and panhandle and require them to wear some type of identification so violators can be turned in. In exchange, if they finish a certain period of time without violating the terms of their agreement, they get a car and 6 months of free housing in some other locale far far away? Offer only applies to current homeless, relocation disqualifies. It's really too bad they built that tram for the rich doctors!
Mar 3, '07
nina, re; minimum wage jobs not keeping up with the cost of living. The minimum wage should be automatically inflation index price adjusted. If this were done, the wage would still always be comparatively minimum, but at least the workers wouldn't have to take the hit during the long periods between government's gestures of magnanimity; finally getting around to kicking down an increase in the minimum wage.
1:55 p.m.
Mar 3, '07
"Hey, I have a progressive idea.... Why don't they make the homeless sign an agreement not to harass and panhandle and require them to wear some type of identification so violators can be turned in. In exchange, if they finish a certain period of time without violating the terms of their agreement, they get a car and 6 months of free housing in some other locale far far away? Offer only applies to current homeless, relocation disqualifies. It's really too bad they built that tram for the rich doctors!"
Must...resist...urge to...invoke Godwin's Law...
1:57 p.m.
Mar 3, '07
Israel--the editorial says the count was CoP; my understanding is it was the entire county, including Gresham.
Mar 3, '07
Torrid Joe - you are right. We got that wrong!