Happy New Year
Russell Sadler
We are starting the sixth year of the new millennium and we are still pronouncing the year two-thousand-six.
Since the beginning of the millennium, when the tastemakers in the broadcast media began pronouncing it two-thousand-one, the rest of us have followed along. Perhaps that reflects the pronunciation of the title of the Stanley Kubrick film 2001: A Space Odyssey, or perhaps it is just a leftover from the year 2000. But it won’t do for a permanent name.
Charles Osgood uses twenty-oh-six on CBS Sunday Morning feature program. He is the only member of the media I’ve heard using the term consistently.
If we don’t follow Osgood’s pronunciation by 2010, what are we going to do when the chronological odometer turns 2101? Are we going to call it a tongue-twisting wordburger like two-thousand-one hundred and one? Or are we going to say twenty-one-oh-one? History is on the side of the latter.
Lewis and Clark began their epic voyage west in 1804, pronounced eighteen-oh four, and returned in 1806, pronounced eighteen-oh-six.
Oregon became a territory of the United States in 1849 pronounced eighteen forty nine, and a state in 1859, pronounced eighteen-fifty-nine.
Darwin’s Origin of Species was published in 1859, pronounced eighteen-fifty-nine.
We say nineteen-hundred and nineteen-oh-one. The stock market crash that triggered the Great Depression was in 1929, pronounced nineteen-twenty-nine.
I suspect we are going to call 2010, twenty-ten. a decade later we may say it is twenty-twenty if the corporation that makes the windshield washer fluid 20/20 hasn’t trademarked the pronunciation and insists on charging us royalties every time we say it.
I suspect we will call 2101, twenty one-oh-one. You can read old-timers who write, “back in oh-one we walked a mile to school in the rain and snow. You kids are soft nowadays." The old timers means nineteen-oh-one, of course, not twenty-oh-one which we have been calling two-thousand-one.
We’ll be saying -- if we make it -- “back in oh-one we had to ride a bus to school,” complaining how easy kids have it being teleported to school in twenty-one-oh-one. Beam me up, Scotty.
Change of something as fundamental as the expression of time often comes slowly. The Gregorian calendar was developed by Jesuit scholar Christopher Clavius who lived from 1537 to 1612.
In 1582 Pope Gregory XIII issued a papal bull officially adopting the new calendar. It was resisted because that great scuffle between Protestants and Catholics -- the Reformation -- was already under way. Roman Catholics used it but no one else did. England kept the Julian calendar until 1752!
Colonization and international trade pressured the rest of the world to use the Gregorian calendar but it really didn't become universal until 1912.
I was going to wish you Happy New Year, but that effort at inoffensive good cheer may be jeopardized by the multicultural thought police and the increasingly belligerent Christian Republicans and their partisan pastors. Mere tolerance of others isn’t a sufficient motive for good cheer anymore. They intend to force all of us to choose sides.
It seems the terms B.C. and A.D. are now suspect. I am not talking about cartoonist Johnny Hart's B.C. comic strip. I am talking about B.C. as in "The Romans sacked Carthage in 146 B.C." and A.D. as in "King John signed the Magna Carta in 1215 A.D."
B.C. stands for Before Christ. A.D. stands for Anno Domini which is Latin for "year of our Lord." It was the first universal dating system, invented by a little-known scholar and abbot, Dionysius Exiguus (Dennis the Little) in the early 6th century and popularized by the Venerable Bede, one of the first independent scholars, in the early 8th century. This was the system adapted by Christopher Clavius in his Gregorian calendar.
These traditional terms are insufficiently secular for today’s timorous textbook publishers. Some are struggling with a new dating system. The Romans sacked Carthage in 146 B.C.E., according to these revisionists. King John signed the Magna Carta in 1215 C.E. A brief translation from New Speak reveals B.C.E. means Before the Current Era. C.E. means Current Era. When did the Current Era begin? About One A.D.
I had better close with my personal best wishes for a Happy New Year before Bill O’Reilly accuses liberals of conducting a War Against New Years.
More Recent Posts | |
Albert Kaufman |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
Kari Chisholm |
Final pre-census estimate: Oregon's getting a sixth congressional seat |
Albert Kaufman |
Polluted by Money - How corporate cash corrupted one of the greenest states in America |
Guest Column |
|
Albert Kaufman |
Our Democrat Representatives in Action - What's on your wish list? |
Kari Chisholm |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
connect with blueoregon
Jan 1, '06
How about just starting over on Sept. 11, 2001? All of this BC, AD, BCE BS is only brought up by those in a pre-9/11 mindset. While we're at it we might want to get rid of all those chronological divisions with pagan, roman, and norse origins.
Today would be Conday, the 22nd of ToraBora, in the year of our protector 5.
August 20th 1998 would be known Albertoday, the 10th of ExcessCivilLiberty, in the year of our darkness 4.
Furthermore I think if we clapped loud enough we could speed up the earth's rotation enough to forgo the planned leap second. Scientists are irrelevant now. We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality --judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do. Astronomical prediction is a thing of the past.
1:35 p.m.
Jan 1, '06
Very good B, very good.
Besides, the world is only 6,000 years old anyway, right?
7:38 p.m.
Jan 1, '06
it's impossible to force language to jump thru hoops. we will call it "2 thousand six" etc for years, and when it becomes too much of a nuisance, we'll switch to "20-oh-whatever". language changes in ways no one can foresee or control. it ain't worth the effort. hell, a few of us tried to remind people that Jan 1, 2000 was the first day of the last year of the millenia, not Day 1 of the 21st Century; that worked really well. language is the intrinsic defining characteristic of what it means to be human (if you believe that particular theory, which i do); the factors that go into creating and developing langauge are as complex as human beings & human society.
most people in the US do know what "BC" means but find me someone who knows what "AD" means; most would possibly think it meant "after death" which while in keeping with the line of thought behind "BC" is kind of anti-Christian in its focus on death rather than resurrection. this is not an issue to fight, not like keeping the 10 Commandments out of courts and prayer out of school. "BC" and "AD" are terms that are empty of real meaning; they are just handy cut-off points for history. referring to the year "10-oh-66 BC" does not mean you are personally pointing to the birth of Jesus as the fulcrum of human history; it just means you really do have no frikkin' idea when the Normans invaded England.
Jan 1, '06
I like twenty-ought-six.
We commonly use "the eighties" and "the nineties." Will this decade be called the oughts?
11:58 p.m.
Jan 1, '06
Courtney--
I've been wondering the same thing.
Jan 2, '06
Since we seem to be in a prognosticating mood, my prediction is that we'll keep using "two-thousand-whatever" at least through 2009. By 2020 we'll be saying "twenty-twenty". If I had to narrow it down, I'd guess the changeover will come when we move into the teens ... two-thousand-twelve, followed by twenty-thirteen. As T.A. said, it will just happen as a natural sociolinguistic process.
"Ought" is the word people who were born in the 1800s used to refer to the first decade of the 20th century. We don't appear to have the need to do this for the 2000s. (I could probably find some words to describe the first decade of the 21st century, but they wouldn't have anything to do with numbers.)
3:15 a.m.
Jan 2, '06
It's just been driving me crazy, because I can talk about the "eighties" or "nineties," but I haven't been able to figure out what to call this decade.
7:14 p.m.
Jan 2, '06
and you know, in the year 25-25... (testing your music trivia knowledge here)
Jan 2, '06