Kicker, Rainy Days, and Double Dipping In Salem
Chuck Sheketoff
When the Legislature adopts a budget they project an ending balance. Throughout the 1990s the actual biennial ending balances were usually significantly higher than what the Legislature thought. The ending balance becomes the beginning balance for the next budget period. Thus, it is always a source of funds for programs and services Oregonians rely upon.
Take this budget cycle. The Legislature left town in 2003 and thought that their ending balance would be $56.5 million. By December 2004 when the Governor proposed a budget, the ending balance had grown by $34.1 million to $90.6 million. As of the May revenue forecast, the ending balance is now projected to be $292 million. That means the Legislature and the Governor have $202 million more available to fund the services Oregonians rely upon.
If revenue exceeds projections by 2 percent or more, the extra revenue is all "kicked" back to the taxpayer. In years that the kicker kicks the ending balance is one of the sources of the kicker refunds made in that next budget period. In the budget period ending yesterday, corporate tax revenue exceeded projections by 2% or more, so corporate Oregon will be getting a $62.6 kicker rebate.
Under the Oregon Business Association's so-called "rainy day proposal," SB 841, some funds in the ending balance are sent to the grossly misnamed Education Stability Fund the following budget period. So, if the kicker kicks, then the ending balance is tapped in the next budget period for both the kicker AND the deposit to the Education Stability Fund.
Take 1999-01. That biennium revenues exceeded projections by more than 2%, so in late-November 2001 (during the 2001-03 biennium) we sent a $254 million kicker refund to taxpayers (at time that the projected shortfall was $700 million, and later grew to about $2 billion during the course of the hellish special sessions of 2002). In other words, the shortfall was exacerbated by the kicker payment from the previous biennium's honest missed projection of anticipated revenues. If SB 841 were in place, according to the LRO revenue projection, $192 million of the 1999-01 ending balance would have been deposited in the Educational Stability Fund after December 31, 2002, exacerbating the budget shortfall.
That's double-dipping. Why spend ending balance funds that are needed to fund the kicker refunds? Why would we want to deposit funds in the Education Stability Fund at a time when we recognize the that the current budget is out of balance? When people get laid off and go on unemployment they stop making their monthly deposits into the xmas fund - shouldn't the state, as well?
The double dipping is even more frustrating given that the Legislature is sitting back and allowing a $62.6 million kicker for the most profitable corporations in Oregon. About half of the total tax cut will flow to only 50 Oregon corporations. Ninety percent of the total tax cut will be bestowed on fewer than four out of every 100 corporations. All of the money comes out of the budget for the next two year budget period that started today. If divvied up proportionally, that means about $30 million came from schools.
Go figure.
More Recent Posts | |
Albert Kaufman |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
Kari Chisholm |
Final pre-census estimate: Oregon's getting a sixth congressional seat |
Albert Kaufman |
Polluted by Money - How corporate cash corrupted one of the greenest states in America |
Guest Column |
|
Albert Kaufman |
Our Democrat Representatives in Action - What's on your wish list? |
Kari Chisholm |
|
Guest Column |
|
Kari Chisholm |
|
connect with blueoregon
Jul 5, '05
I'm just a normal taxpayer, but I would love to see the kicker completely eliminated. I don't exactly get all excited when the state cuts me a check of $100, and I know the money could be better spent towards some sort of social program that might prevent our state from becoming the worst-funded in the nation.
Jul 6, '05
OK, heres a wild idea, why not do a budget to the projected revenues and stick with it. If revenues exceed projections by 2%, put that in a rainy day fund. Then return the excess back as a kicker?
Of course, this would not work since every time the legislature sees any extra money (like with the past year's bumps up in projected revenue) new ways to spend it are created.
If someone could trust this group to show some discipline, then I might be willing to believe a rainy day fund would work. Otherwise, shouldn't the money go back to those who paid it?
Justin - Just don't cash your kicker check if you want to give it back. After six months it expires and goes back to the state.